Skip to content

What is the Difference Between External vs Internal Sources of Finance?

Table of Contents

As a startup founder, financing is essential to the continued growth and profitability of your business. It comes in various forms, including debt and equity. A lesser-considered but equally important form of finance is internal financing. This describes using the capital your company currently holds to fund whatever your project might be. This article will explain the difference between external and internal sources of financing so that you can ensure you are deploying your startup’s capital most efficiently. 

What is Internal Financing?

As the name suggests, internal financing refers to the funds available to the company without resorting to external sources. You can break down internal financing into long-term and short-term internal financing. 

Long-term financing essentially describes your startup’s retained earnings. This is all the aggregate profits your business has generated but has not been distributed to shareholders as dividends. 

Short-term internal financing describes managing your working capital to allow you to repurpose the funds for certain purposes. In particular, you can change how you manage your credit controls, inventory levels and trade payables. 

How is Internal Financing Different from External Financing?

The difference between the two forms of financing is quite straightforward. Internal financing refers to capital that is already in possession of your startup. You do not need to go to prospective equity or debt investors to access the cash. Assuming you have adequate internal financing sources, internal financing is often preferable to external financing. This is because the authority to access the capital remains with your company. 

In turn, you do not need to worry about the dilution of shares in accessing internal financing as you would under equity financing. Nor do you need to incur onerous borrower obligations common under debt financing.  

However, internal financing usually requires you to have adequate capital reserves in the form of retained earnings. Many startups, especially early-stage ones, lack ample reserves because they have yet to generate sales at a profit. 

Continue reading this article below the form
Need legal advice?
Call 0808 196 8584 for urgent assistance.
Otherwise, complete this form and we will contact you within one business day.

What are the Disadvantages of Internal Financing?

A common misconception is that your internal sources of financing, particularly your retained earnings, are free sources of capital. That is not true. All businesses have obligations to return wealth to their investors. 

If your startup has borrowed money in debt or convertible notes that remain unconverted, you need to service the interest payments on the debt. This requires your startup to generate sufficient cash to meet these interest obligations. 

Moreover, your shareholders expect to be compensated for their investment. Startup shareholder investors are usually prepared to delay any dividend payments in favour of the startup reinvesting available earnings into the company to grow its asset value. Nonetheless, there is a value your startup should place on its ability to generate sufficient earnings to reinvest back into the business. 

You can work out the minimum returns your startup must generate in cash flow to meet its interest payments and achieve sufficient capital growth (or distribute dividends, as the case may be). This figure is called your startup’s weighted average cost of capital. 

If your startup intends to draw on its retained earnings, it should be confident that the proceeds of these finances will exceed the weighted average cost of capital. 

Case Study

Market conditions require your startup to achieve at least a 20% return on its investment to satisfy its weighted average cost of capital. This means that for every £100 you invest right now, it needs to generate the equivalent cash flow of £120 today.

You believe that your startup can acquire a valuable piece of intellectual property for £100,000. Your startup’s finance team runs the numbers and confirms that the intellectual property will generate a 25% discounted return on the initial investment over the next five years. Accordingly, this exceeds the minimum threshold of 20% you need to meet your weighted average cost of capital.

Internal Financing and the Pecking Order Theory 

Modern financial management theory argues that businesses should prioritise the following sources of capital in what is called the pecking order theory:

  • use retained earnings where at all possible;
  • if your startup does not have sufficient capital, you should use debt financing; and
  • as a last resort, you should raise equity capital. 

However, the pecking order theory is less relevant for startups. This is because raising equity finance is the primary source of capital for businesses in their early stages of growth. An entire segment of the investment market is prepared to assume the relatively high risk of investing in startups in exchange for the potential upside of investing in a successful company. 

Thus, while internal financing can be a great source of capital for your startup, financial management theories that prioritise internal financing may not capture the growth objectives of your startup. 

Front page of publication
Startup Manual

LegalVision’s Startup Manual is essential reading material for any startup founder looking to launch and grow a successful startup.

Download Now

Key Takeaways 

Internal financing offers startups the advantage of using their own capital without diluting the existing shares or incurring onerous borrowing obligations. However, you must have adequate retained earnings to draw from to finance a project internally. Nor is internal financing a free source of capital. The return on the invested internal source of funds must exceed the required return on capital employed, just as it would using external financing. Finally, while more mature businesses tend to favour internal financing as a capital source of first resort, startups have different objectives. For these reasons, you may need to embrace external financing in the form of equity and hybrid financing. 

If you need help with your startup, our experienced business lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 0808 196 8584 or visit our membership page

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between internal and external financing for startups? 

Internal financing refers to using the company’s existing capital, while external financing involves seeking funds from outside sources such as venture capital investors or lenders.

What is the main advantage of internal financing for startups? 

Internal financing allows startups to use their capital without diluting ownership or incurring borrower obligations, giving them greater control over their funding.

Register for our free webinars

Understanding Your Business’ New Employment Law Obligations

Online
Ensure your business is compliant with the new employment law changes. Register for our free webinar to learn more.
Register Now

A Roadmap to Business Success: How to Franchise in the UK

Online
Learn the formula for successfully franchising your UK business. Register for our free webinar today.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Jake Rickman

Jake Rickman

Read all articles by Jake

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2023 Economic Innovator of the Year Finalist - The Spectator

  • Award

    2023 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2023 Future of Legal Services Innovation - Legal Innovation Awards

  • Award

    2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm in APAC - Financial Times