Skip to content

My Business is Facing Insolvency. What is a Transaction at an Undervalue?

Table of Contents

If your business cannot meet its financial obligations, it may be insolvent. When a business is insolvent or facing insolvency, the law can review the business’s transactions in the previous two years. Additionally, the directors may be liable if your company has undertaken a transaction at an undervalue. This article will define what a transaction at an undervalue entails and its consequences. 

What is a Transaction at an Undervalue? 

A transaction at an undervalue is any transaction an insolvent company undertakes where it sells a non-cash asset for significantly less than its market value. For instance, say a company owns a piece of machinery (a non-cash asset) valued at £100,000. The company then sells it for £10,000. This likely amounts to a transaction at an undervalue. 

In some cases, a transaction at an undervalue might include instances where the insolvent company grants a creditor security for less than the security’s value. For instance, a mortgage over a piece of land valued at £1m for £10,000 may offend the rule against transactions at an undervalue. 

What is Insolvency?

Insolvency is where a business either has:

  • inadequate assets to meet its liabilities on the balance sheet; or 
  • insufficient cash to meet obligations as and when they come due. 

For instance, if a company has £10,000 in liabilities and £5,000 in assets, it is insolvent on a balance sheet basis. On the other hand, if a company has £10,000 in current liabilities but £5,000 in cash with no prospect of raising any more cash, it is insolvent on a cash flow basis. 

Continue reading this article below the form
Need legal advice?
Call 0808 196 8584 for urgent assistance.
Otherwise, complete this form and we will contact you within one business day.

Who Can Bring a Claim For a Transaction at an Undervalue?

Only a liquidator or administrator can bring a claim against the creditor. A liquidator is the insolvency practitioner the court appoints to oversee a company’s liquidation. On the other hand, an administrator is the insolvency practitioner overseeing an administration. 

However, the transaction must have occurred within two years before the insolvency occurred. Specifically, this is at the point that either liquidation or administration commences. 

Was the Transaction At an Undervalue with a Connected Person?

If the transaction involves a connected person or an associate, the law takes a stricter view of the transaction. A connected person refers to a shadow director. Whereas an associate is anyone whose relation to the insolvent company’s director includes:

  • a spouse; 
  • a relative of the director or spouse of the director, which is widely defined; 
  • a business partner; 
  • an employer or employee; 
  • certain trustees to trusts; and
  • a separate company to which the director is connected. 

If the undervalued transaction was with a connected person, the law adapts the presumption that the company was insolvent at the time of the transaction. In this instance, the company (and its directors) must rebut this presumption. 

However, this is not an essential element to prove, given a transaction at an undervalue can still exist even if the other party is not a connected person.

Where the transaction is with an unconnected person, the liquidator or administrator must prove that the company was insolvent at the time of the transaction. Alternatively, the liquidator or administrator must demonstrate that the transaction contributed to the insolvency. 

Front page of publication
Supplier Contracts Checklist

Use this checklist to ensure your supplier contracts contain all necessary terms.

Download Now

What is the Effect of a Successful Application?

The court can set aside the transaction if a liquidator or administrator brings a successful claim. This is referred to as a voidable transaction. As a result, the court might order the company that benefited from the undervalued transaction to:

  • return the asset; or 
  • pay its market value. 

Notably, a claim for a transaction at an undervalue is distinct from any claim a liquidator or administrator brings against the director.

Are There Any Defences?  

The court will refuse an application where it is satisfied that:

  • the company entered into the transaction in good faith to carry on its business; and 
  • at the time of the transaction, there were reasonable grounds for believing that the transaction would benefit the company. 

An example might be when a company sells property at a steep discount to raise cash. While the transaction may technically be undervalued, the directors may have authorised the transaction as a last-ditch effort to keep trading. 

Key Takeaways 

A transaction at an undervalue is where a company sells a non-cash asset for substantially less than its market value. If the company becomes insolvent within two years of the transaction, the insolvency practitioner who takes control of the company can apply to the court to reverse the transaction. 

If you need help navigating your company’s financial difficulty, our experienced corporate lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today at 0808 196 8584 or visit our membership page.

Frequently Asked Questions

My company may not be able to pay all its debts. Should I keep trading?

You should seek immediate advice the moment you realise your company may not be able to meet all of its liabilities. An expert can advise you on whether you can continue to trade.

Who is a connected person in an undervalued transaction?

A connected person refers to a shadow director.

Register for our free webinars

Preparing Your Business For Success in 2025

Online
Ensure your business gets off to a successful start in 2025. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

2025 Employment Law Changes: What Businesses Should Know

Online
Ensure your business stays ahead of 2025 employment law changes. Register for our free webinar today.
Register Now

Buying a Tech or Online Business: What You Should Know

Online
Learn how to get the best deal when buying a tech or online business. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

How the New Digital and Consumer Laws Impact Your Business

Online
Understand how the new digital and consumer laws affect your business. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Jake Rickman

Jake Rickman

Jake is an Expert Legal Contributor for LegalVision. He is completing his solicitor training with a commercial law firm and has previous experience consulting with investment funds. Jake is also the founder and director of a legal content company.

Qualifications: Masters of Law – LLM, BPP Law School; Masters of Studies, English and American Studies, University of Oxford; Bachelor of Arts, Concentration in Philosophy and Literature, Sarah Lawrence College; Graduate Diploma – Law, The University of Law.

Read all articles by Jake

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2023 Economic Innovator of the Year Finalist - The Spectator

  • Award

    2023 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2023 Future of Legal Services Innovation - Legal Innovation Awards