Skip to content

Can a Director Be Forced Out?

Table of Contents

Disputes may arise between and among the directors and shareholders of a limited company. In some cases, directors and shareholders may wish to remove a particular director from the company. This can often become an acrimonious dispute, especially when the director is a shareholder. Regardless of where you stand in a potential dispute, you may wonder if a company director can be forced out. Unfortunately, the answer is yes, in some cases. This article will explain the law surrounding this position in more detail. 

Removal By Ordinary Resolution 

Shareholders can remove a director by an ordinary resolution. The company’s articles of association cannot try and exclude this right of the shareholders. Otherwise, any attempt to do so is automatically void. 

This means that a company, through its articles of association, cannot increase the threshold required to remove a director of a special resolution (i.e., 75% or more).

The practical consequence is that if more than half of the shareholders wish to remove a director, they can. In doing so, the company effectively removes the directors by the direction of its shareholders.

What Are the Laws Regarding Shareholder Voting? 

A shareholder’s voting power depends on how the shareholders vote on the ordinary resolution to remove the director. 

Consider the following example. ABC Ltd has the following shareholders with the following percentage of shares (assuming they are all ordinary shares with voting rights attached):

Shareholder Percentage of Shares Owned 
John 51%
Ahmed9%
Izzy20%
Carter10%
Joy10%

If the shareholders vote on the resolution at a general meeting (rather than via written resolution), the default position is that a show of hands decides votes. This means each shareholder has one vote, regardless of the number of shares they own. 

Accordingly, if John was a director and three out of the four remaining shareholders wanted to remove John, they could do so by a show of hands. 

However, all shareholders with more than 10% of the voting shares can demand a poll vote. If John demanded a poll vote, he would outvote the remaining shareholders and remain as a director.

Continue reading this article below the form
Need legal advice?
Call 0808 196 8584 for urgent assistance.
Otherwise, complete this form and we will contact you within one business day.

Can Shareholder Agreements Prevent Removal?

This being the case, it is worth observing that many companies have shareholder agreements. Many shareholder agreements contain provisions that appear to restrict the ability of the shareholders to remove certain directors. You may therefore wonder how these agreements operate if company law refuses to restrict the power of a majority of shareholders from removing a director. 

The answer is that shareholders’ agreements are private agreements between the shareholders. That is to say, shareholder agreements are agreements between the shareholders in their private capacity. It does not affect their capacity as shareholders in the company. This is because the company’s articles of association govern this relationship. 

In other words, a shareholders’ agreement is a separate but parallel contract that creates a separate set of rights and obligations between the parties to the agreement. So, for example, where the shareholders’ agreement has a term that prevents one director from being removed by the others, the company (through the direction of a majority of its shareholders) can still remove the director.

However, each shareholder that does so breaches the private shareholders’ agreement. This, in turn, gives the aggrieved director a right to claim against the offending shareholders for damages for breach of contract. Nevertheless, a breach of the shareholders’ agreement does not invalidate the shareholders’ vote to remove the director at the company level. 

Front page of publication
Board Resolution

This template helps you document important and major decisions or actions reached in board meetings.

Download Now

Case Study 

Consider the following scenario. ABC Ltd shareholders (as listed above) have also signed a shareholders’ agreement. They are also all directors. 

One of the terms of the agreement disallows any party to vote to remove another party from their office as a director without breaching the agreement. A separate clause states that any breach of this contract creates a cause of action against that person for damages. 

Despite this, a dispute has emerged between Carter and the other shareholders. John and Izzy want to remove Carter. Carter has a five-year contract worth £500,000 in future wages and other benefits with the company. A shareholder resolution is called. John and Izzy vote to remove Carter on a poll vote. The rest vote no. Despite this, the resolution is passed. By law, the company has removed Carter. 

Carter now has a cause of action against John and Izzy. The claim’s value will likely be £500,000 (plus costs). John and Izzy are now personally liable to Carter for this amount if Carter brings a claim and wins. 

For these reasons, shareholders’ agreements are powerful tools to protect directors from removal. Even though the company can legally remove the director, shareholders are unlikely to vote to remove a director if they are personally liable.

Further Consideration

There are two other important points to consider when using shareholder agreements. 

1. Parties to the Contract 

A shareholders’ agreement only binds the parties to that agreement. This means that:

  • if certain shareholders vote to remove a director; and 
  • these shareholders never signed the agreement; then 
  • they are not in breach of the shareholders’ agreement if they vote to remove one of the directors that is a party to the agreement. 

Likewise, a director not a party to the shareholder agreement will not benefit from the shareholders’ agreement. 

2. Court Application to Purchase Shares 

The law often considers it unfair to force a shareholder deprived of their office as a director to continue being a shareholder. This is because they no longer have the power to manage the company, despite having invested a potentially significant amount of money. 

Accordingly, the aggrieved shareholder removed as a director may apply to the court. If the court considers it fair, the remaining shareholders can purchase the aggrieved director’s shares at a competitive price.

Key Takeaways 

The law grants shareholders the right to remove directors through an ordinary resolution. The company cannot impair this right. As a result, shareholders can remove any director by passing a resolution. However, a shareholder agreement can make shareholders personally liable to other shareholders if they breach the terms of the agreement. As such, shareholder agreements can protect directors should shareholders remove them. Nevertheless, a breach of the shareholders’ agreement does not invalidate any resolution the shareholders lawfully passed. 

If you have any questions about the rights of shareholders and directors, our experienced corporate lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. For a low monthly fee, you will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents. Call us today on 0808 196 8584 or visit our membership page.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a company director?

A company director is an individual who holds a position within a company’s management and has certain rights and obligations outlined in the company’s constitution.

What is a shareholder?

A shareholder is an individual who holds shares in a company.

Register for our free webinars

Preparing Your Business For Success in 2025

Online
Ensure your business gets off to a successful start in 2025. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

2025 Employment Law Changes: What Businesses Should Know

Online
Ensure your business stays ahead of 2025 employment law changes. Register for our free webinar today.
Register Now

Buying a Tech or Online Business: What You Should Know

Online
Learn how to get the best deal when buying a tech or online business. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now

How the New Digital and Consumer Laws Impact Your Business

Online
Understand how the new digital and consumer laws affect your business. Register for our free webinar.
Register Now
See more webinars >
Jake Rickman

Jake Rickman

Jake is an Expert Legal Contributor for LegalVision. He is completing his solicitor training with a commercial law firm and has previous experience consulting with investment funds. Jake is also the founder and director of a legal content company.

Qualifications: Masters of Law – LLM, BPP Law School; Masters of Studies, English and American Studies, University of Oxford; Bachelor of Arts, Concentration in Philosophy and Literature, Sarah Lawrence College; Graduate Diploma – Law, The University of Law.

Read all articles by Jake

About LegalVision

LegalVision is an innovative commercial law firm that provides businesses with affordable, unlimited and ongoing legal assistance through our membership. We operate in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Learn more

We’re an award-winning law firm

  • Award

    2024 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2024 Law Firm of the Year Finalist - Modern Law Private Client Awards

  • Award

    2023 Economic Innovator of the Year Finalist - The Spectator

  • Award

    2023 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

  • Award

    2023 Future of Legal Services Innovation - Legal Innovation Awards